The numbers for 2012 are pretty gaudy. Everybody feels like a genius when we have a year like this one. Even the Moron feels a little smarter. The range goes from the big winner, Fairholme, all the way down to the worst performing fund, Oakmark Balanced, which still made 9%.
Vanguard Total Stock Market finished relatively high for 2012, 12th out of 30 funds. The last time we ran the 10 years numbers, it finished 20th out of 28th. All but one of our funds that trailed VTSMX in 2012 have equaled or beaten it over the trailing 10 year period. Comments are offered for Jenson, the only fund to trail it both for 2012 and the trailing 10 year period. (For this purpose, 10 year numbers as of 2/12/2013 were used.
It became obvious quite early in the year that Fairholme was going to run away with the race in 2012, this after a terrible 2011. So props to our first MFM fund of the year, Fairholme!
And here are the gaudy numbers we are talking about for the MFM30:
1. Fairholme +35.81%
2. Third Avenue Value 27.48
3. Janus Contrarian 23.83
4. Mairs & Power Growth Fund 21.91
5. Kinetics Paradigm 21.78
6. Bridgeway Agressive 21.58
7. Templeton Growth 21.54
8. Dodge and Cox Foreign 21.03
9. Ariel 20.32
10. Litman Gregory Masters Int'l 19.96
11. T. Rowe Price Spectrum Growth 18.13
12. Vanguard Total Stock Market Index 16.38
13. Fidelity Contra 16.26
14. Sequoia 15.68
15. Franklin Balance Sheet 15.65
16. Royce Special Equity 15.36
17. Mutual Shares 15.14
18. FMI Large Cap 14.86
19. T. Rowe Price Mid Cap Growth 13.91
20. Columbia Value and Restructuring 13.90
21. Franklin Income 13.68
22. Osterweis 13.66
23. Jenson 13.54
Highest quality stocks only, much of the 10 year underperformance is attributable to fees and expenses. Much but not all of it. True, it has beaten VTSMX over the trailing 15 year period, but still, the results on this one have to be considered a disappointment, so why does Morningstar rate it a "Gold"?
24. Vanguard Dividend Appreciation Index 11.50
25. Yacktman 11.47
26. Franklin Small Mid Cap Growth 10.78
27. FPA Crescent 10.33
28. Perkins Mid Cap Value 10.32
29. Wasatch Heritage Growth 9.45
30. Oakmark Balanced 9.05
Quite a good year.
But even a Moron knows not to get used to it.
Tuesday, February 12, 2013
Tuesday, September 4, 2012
August 2012 Performance
The Moron has already mentioned how silly and pointless it is to track short-term performance. So
if that applies to our year-to-date performance, how would one describe the practice of tracking performance for a single month? We can't even say with confidence whether 2012 will be an up or down year for our funds or the market -- any inferences drawn from the performance in August alone are likely to be bad ones.
Nonetheless, we just can't help ourselves. Poring over results in good months and ignoring them in bad months is one of MFM's coping strategies. So, we'll try not to make a habit of it, but here goes a look at the top and bottom quintiles for last month.
Top Quintile
1. Fairholme + 8.08%2. Ariel 5.38
3. Bridgeway Agressive 4.51
4. Royce Special Equity 4.26
5. Templeton Growth 3.80
6. T. Rowe Price Mid-Cap Growth 3.66
Bottom Quintile
25. Yacktman + 2.06%26. Third Avenue Value 2.00
27. Janus Contrarian 1.86
28. Vanguard Div. Appreciation 1.82
29. FMI Large Cap 1.54
30. Franklin Income .99
Thursday, August 30, 2012
Ten Year Numbers
MFM has already mentioned how silly it is to track short term results, although we do it anyway, but it's hard to argue against the significance of a decade's worth of performance numbers.
The numbers below are 10 year results through August 28, 2012. Nothing special about that date, it's just when the moron got around to compiling these results. The cut line 10 years ago is a pretty bizarre one. Ten years ago we were in the final several months of the debacle that was 2002. Therefore, these results all exclude the big gains of the late 90s as well as the big declines of 2000, 2001, and 2002 through very late August.
From today until next March, one can take it to the bank that the annualized 10-year numbers for all of these funds will increase significantly. That is because poor performance days, weeks and months are falling off of the back end of the sample period. Looked at another way, we can say that current prices will be compared to starting prices that will be lower and lower.
Fund companies wishing to tout high 10-year returns will be well-advised to wait until March 2013 to do so.
Two of the MFM30, Vanguard Dividend Appreciation and Wasatch Heritage Growth, do not have 10-year track records, and are thus not included below. That leaves us with 28 funds. Therefore, instead of dividing the funds into quintiles, we will divide them into four quartiles of seven funds each. Following each fund name is its annualized percentage gain over the 10-year period.
1. T. Rowe Price Mid-Cap Growth (PRMGX) 11.1%
The Champ! What's not to like here? Outstanding fund company, the same manager and strategy since 1992, low fees, above average in its category for 9 of the past 10 calendar years, not once in the bottom quartile in those years. Closed to new investors is MFM's understanding, but the fine print on that is confusing.
2. Yacktman (YACKX) 10.71%
The subject of our most recent post. Has won largely by playing defense and being patient. Not only super results, but excellent protection of capital.
3. Perkins Mid-Cap Value (JMCVX) 9.67%
Has the J in its ticker symbol because it used to be called Janus Mid-Cap Value. Another fund that has shown superior relative performance in down markets. Very consistent performer. One of the Moron's favorites.
4. Dodge and Cox International (DODFX) 9.58%
Certainly as good a choice as any for an international fund. Consistent, disciplined strategy. Very low fees, a team approach, from a company with old fashioned values. Founded in 1930, Dodge and Cox only has 5 funds and they do not advertise. This performance includes a loss of over 50% from late 2007 to early 2009. Nothing fancy here, but solid.
5. Fairholme (FAIRX) 9.53%
The only important question here is: Does Bruce Berkowitz know what he's doing? MFM thinks he does. There is still no cure for premature accumulation though, and Bruce's intelligence level will continue to fluctuate greatly from year to year. Investors here will be well advised to either understand their investment thoroughly, or just to go away and come back in 15 - 20 years.
6. Kinetics Paradigm (WWNPX) 9.30%
Outrageously high fees. Suspect strategy. Held up well in 2002, but got absolutely hammered in 2008 -- down over 53% in that calendar year alone. Still, for the moment anyway, the 10 year results are very strong. It's quite unlikely that such out-performance was due to luck alone, especially when one considers the abusive fees that the fund had to overcome to achieve it. MFM would love to dump this one from the MFM30, but its out-performance persists. Very strong year-to-date results.
7. FMI Large Cap (FMIHX) 9.28%
Only 29 stocks (topped by 3M, Walmart, and Berkshire Hathaway) and a turnover of 28%. Holds 11% cash and some foreign stocks. Not overly huge at $6 billion. Fund reports are way above average, and demonstrate a concern for the macro-economics as well as bottom up stock picking. MFM feels like these people can be trusted.
With assets over $84 billion there is no possible way this fund can do what it has done, but it keeps on doing it and we keep holding on. Big positions in Apple, Google, Coca-Cola, and Berkshire Hathaway. This has become, de facto, Fidelity's flagship fund. At one time the monicker "Contra" was supposed to mean something about the strategy followed. Now it's just a name. It's a stock fund. And right now, despite its size, it's a good one.
9. Royce Special Equity (RYSEX) 9.23%
Gotta love a fund with SEX in its ticker symbol. Truly managed to not lose money, the manager is a real nerd about reading financial reports and deciding whether they should be classified as "fiction" or "non-fiction". The exercise has proved valuable. "only" lost a bit less than 20% in 2008. Closed to new investors as of February of this year. An easy fund to hold on to.
10. FPA Crescent Fund (FPACX) 9.19%
Maybe it's quirky. Maybe it's eccentric. Steven Romnick's goal is to provide equity-like returns with less risk than the overall stock market. So far he's been quite successful at doing so. Holds quarterly reviews in which he takes questions from investors. It's especially fun to hold this one when the overall market heads south.
11. Franklin Income (FKINX) 8.64%
This asset-allocation offering has been around forever, and it is good at what it does. Franklin-Templeton is actually a great company, and they may be especially strong on the bond side. A yield of over 6% (!!!) comes from a combination of bonds and dividend-paying stocks. Although returns over the past decade have surely been bolstered by falling interest rates, the Moron believes that this fund can keep regressing to a mean of 7 or 8% per annum. Generally a Steady Eddie, but we had a little drama a few years ago, when the fund was down 30% in 2008 and up 35% in 2009. Management fee is very reasonable at .63%, but there's certainly no reason to pay a 4.25% load to get in. An absolute behemoth at over $63 Billion.
12. Janus Contrarian (JSVAX) 8.49%
Can't really draw any conclusions from the ten-year numbers. Old manager had a superior record, then crashed and burned in 2008 and left without so much as a goodbye. New manager has adopted a more conservative strategy. He has done okay so far, but the jury is still out. Janus is not one of the best fund companies in MFM's opinion. Investors are justified in feeling used and abused when a manager, who should have a fiduciary relationship with them, loses big and then runs away.
13. Osterwies (OSTFX) 8.42%
A plain old stock picker's fund. Concentrated at just 33 stocks. Morningstar classifies it as "Mid-Cap Blend". Still a less than a billion dollars in its coffers, but just a little less. Relatively speaking, it has help up well in bear markets. For example, it was "only" down 12% in 2002 and 29% in 2008. But the long term numbers speak for themselves. Over the past 15 years, the annualized return is + 9.77%.
14. Franklin Small-Mid Cap Growth (FRSGX) 8.41%
This one can really fly in bull markets and can really get slaughtered in bear markets. If you're looking for action, you will find it here. Has been through some changes over the years, and had even changed its name. it used tro be called Franklin Small Cap Growth, but when it was flying high in the late 90's it grew rather portly and had to move up the capitalization ladder to put the money to work. One thing that has not changed is the manager. If we can just avoid those pesky downturns, this one will shine. Otherwise.....maybe not so much.
THIRD QUARTILE
15. Oakmark Equity Income (OAKBX) 8.20%
Manager has the ability to shift the concentration of stocks vs. bonds within wide parameters. recently, he has skewed towards dividend paying stocks as the best way to play defense. Remarkably smooth ride here.
16. T. Rowe Price Spectrum Growth (PRSGX) 8.1%
This fund of funds is organized in such a way that one does not pay double management fees, but rather pays the very reasonable fees that Price funds are known for. Guaranteed never to be the best or the worst growth fund. So far human input has managed to add to growth index returns. Probably will be able to do so in the future. Probably.
17. (tie) Columbia Value and Restructuring (UMBIX) 7.82%
Long time manager recently retired. What we have here at present is a portfolio of very high quality growth stocks. Lost 47% in 2008.
17. (tie) Mairs and Power Growth (MPGFX) 7.82%
45 holdings when last reported. Highest quality names with an emphasis on companies operating in the Minneapolis area. Conservative and patient with a low management fee. Should (!) hold up better than most growth funds in bear markets.
19. Litman Gregory Masters International (MSILX) 7.80%
Fund is divided among 6 subadvisors each running separate portfolios. Again, guaranteed never to be the best or the worst international fund. So far has beaten its peers fairly consistently. Great choice for international exposure.
20. (tie) Third Avenue Value (TAVFX) 7.22%
It's been a wild ride, and the past decade has not been one of the best. The Moron believes the risk is quite limited when holding for 5 years or more. A great diversifier because management analyzes companies from an entirely different perspective from most managers, emphasizing a school of analysis they refer to as "Fundamental Finance".
20. (tie) Vanguard Total Stock Market Index (VTSMX) 7.22%
The Great Dividing Line in our list. This fund represents par for the course of investing in U.S. equities. A market cap weighted index fund representing the entire U.S. market. Expense ratio is as close to zero as Vanguard can get it, recently .05% (!!!) Buy and hold this one and you will get what the market is willing to give you -- no more and only slightly less.
FOURTH QUARTILE
22. Sequoia (SEQUX) 6.60%
The Moron is surprised to find this one trailing VTSMX. For all their celebrated stock picking, over the past decade at least, the index wins. Still a great choice for an equity fund. A concentrated portfolio and managers who are among the best.
23. Franklin Balance Sheet (FRBSX) 6.44%
The Moron is surprised to see this one only slightly trailing the mighty and highly touted Sequoia Fund. Has had the same manager since its inception in 1990. Probably fair to call this an average fund that has held up at least somewhat better than average in bear markets. Long term record is certainly acceptable. Has in fact beaten VTSMX by over 2 full percentage points, annualized, when measured over a 15 year period.
24. Mutual Shares (MUTHX) 6.38%
Designed to hold up well in down drafts, it has usually succeeded in doing so. It did not do so in 2008, doing a little worse than average. Still, the downside capture ratio measured over 15 years is 70%. Not bad. May continue to lag the overall return of the market as it has over the past decade, but as a true value fund, the results should continue to be acceptable and the ride a little smoother.
25. Ariel (ARGFX) 5.69%
Disappointing. In recent years, returns have been characterized by huge swings up and down. Not in character with the "slow and steady" slogan. From peak to trough lost nearly 70% from late 2007 to early 2009. Then it took off like a riot. So what did we get for our pains? About 1.5% less annualized than the total stock market index fund.
26. Bridgeway Aggressive Growth (BRAGX) 5.68%
It's in for a dime, in for a dollar with this one. Hold on for a long, long, long time, and one just might win. Was brutally dismantled in the bear market of 2008. However its 15 year record still sparkles and shines. Certainly not for the faint of heart or the impatient. The one "Quant" fund on our list. Investing decisions here are made by computers according to proprietary formulas. In recent years, the fund has actually sported a negative management fee. (Just like our "Ideal Mutual Fund"). In other words management is actually putting extra money into the fund. This is by agreement, and in response to poor performance in recent years.
27. Jenson Quality Growth (JENSX) 6.62%
As the name says, invests in only the highest quality companies. Over time, investors should do fine here. However, the Moron sees no evidence that this fund will outperform an index of quality companies such as VDAIX. For that reason, will probably be dropped from the MFM30 soon.
28. Templeton Growth (TEPLX) 5.03%
Somebody had to be last, and it's sad that it had to be this venerable fund, of which the Moron will have much more to say later. Founded in 1954 by the legendary John Templeton, this was his firm's flagship fund. The Moron suspects that managers strayed from Sir John's principles in recent years, but now believes the fund is in better hands and back on track.
The numbers below are 10 year results through August 28, 2012. Nothing special about that date, it's just when the moron got around to compiling these results. The cut line 10 years ago is a pretty bizarre one. Ten years ago we were in the final several months of the debacle that was 2002. Therefore, these results all exclude the big gains of the late 90s as well as the big declines of 2000, 2001, and 2002 through very late August.
From today until next March, one can take it to the bank that the annualized 10-year numbers for all of these funds will increase significantly. That is because poor performance days, weeks and months are falling off of the back end of the sample period. Looked at another way, we can say that current prices will be compared to starting prices that will be lower and lower.
Fund companies wishing to tout high 10-year returns will be well-advised to wait until March 2013 to do so.
Two of the MFM30, Vanguard Dividend Appreciation and Wasatch Heritage Growth, do not have 10-year track records, and are thus not included below. That leaves us with 28 funds. Therefore, instead of dividing the funds into quintiles, we will divide them into four quartiles of seven funds each. Following each fund name is its annualized percentage gain over the 10-year period.
Top Quartile
1. T. Rowe Price Mid-Cap Growth (PRMGX) 11.1%
The Champ! What's not to like here? Outstanding fund company, the same manager and strategy since 1992, low fees, above average in its category for 9 of the past 10 calendar years, not once in the bottom quartile in those years. Closed to new investors is MFM's understanding, but the fine print on that is confusing.
2. Yacktman (YACKX) 10.71%
The subject of our most recent post. Has won largely by playing defense and being patient. Not only super results, but excellent protection of capital.
3. Perkins Mid-Cap Value (JMCVX) 9.67%
Has the J in its ticker symbol because it used to be called Janus Mid-Cap Value. Another fund that has shown superior relative performance in down markets. Very consistent performer. One of the Moron's favorites.
4. Dodge and Cox International (DODFX) 9.58%
Certainly as good a choice as any for an international fund. Consistent, disciplined strategy. Very low fees, a team approach, from a company with old fashioned values. Founded in 1930, Dodge and Cox only has 5 funds and they do not advertise. This performance includes a loss of over 50% from late 2007 to early 2009. Nothing fancy here, but solid.
5. Fairholme (FAIRX) 9.53%
The only important question here is: Does Bruce Berkowitz know what he's doing? MFM thinks he does. There is still no cure for premature accumulation though, and Bruce's intelligence level will continue to fluctuate greatly from year to year. Investors here will be well advised to either understand their investment thoroughly, or just to go away and come back in 15 - 20 years.
6. Kinetics Paradigm (WWNPX) 9.30%
Outrageously high fees. Suspect strategy. Held up well in 2002, but got absolutely hammered in 2008 -- down over 53% in that calendar year alone. Still, for the moment anyway, the 10 year results are very strong. It's quite unlikely that such out-performance was due to luck alone, especially when one considers the abusive fees that the fund had to overcome to achieve it. MFM would love to dump this one from the MFM30, but its out-performance persists. Very strong year-to-date results.
7. FMI Large Cap (FMIHX) 9.28%
Only 29 stocks (topped by 3M, Walmart, and Berkshire Hathaway) and a turnover of 28%. Holds 11% cash and some foreign stocks. Not overly huge at $6 billion. Fund reports are way above average, and demonstrate a concern for the macro-economics as well as bottom up stock picking. MFM feels like these people can be trusted.
Second Quartile
8. Fidelity Contra (FCNTX) 9.26%With assets over $84 billion there is no possible way this fund can do what it has done, but it keeps on doing it and we keep holding on. Big positions in Apple, Google, Coca-Cola, and Berkshire Hathaway. This has become, de facto, Fidelity's flagship fund. At one time the monicker "Contra" was supposed to mean something about the strategy followed. Now it's just a name. It's a stock fund. And right now, despite its size, it's a good one.
9. Royce Special Equity (RYSEX) 9.23%
Gotta love a fund with SEX in its ticker symbol. Truly managed to not lose money, the manager is a real nerd about reading financial reports and deciding whether they should be classified as "fiction" or "non-fiction". The exercise has proved valuable. "only" lost a bit less than 20% in 2008. Closed to new investors as of February of this year. An easy fund to hold on to.
10. FPA Crescent Fund (FPACX) 9.19%
Maybe it's quirky. Maybe it's eccentric. Steven Romnick's goal is to provide equity-like returns with less risk than the overall stock market. So far he's been quite successful at doing so. Holds quarterly reviews in which he takes questions from investors. It's especially fun to hold this one when the overall market heads south.
11. Franklin Income (FKINX) 8.64%
This asset-allocation offering has been around forever, and it is good at what it does. Franklin-Templeton is actually a great company, and they may be especially strong on the bond side. A yield of over 6% (!!!) comes from a combination of bonds and dividend-paying stocks. Although returns over the past decade have surely been bolstered by falling interest rates, the Moron believes that this fund can keep regressing to a mean of 7 or 8% per annum. Generally a Steady Eddie, but we had a little drama a few years ago, when the fund was down 30% in 2008 and up 35% in 2009. Management fee is very reasonable at .63%, but there's certainly no reason to pay a 4.25% load to get in. An absolute behemoth at over $63 Billion.
12. Janus Contrarian (JSVAX) 8.49%
Can't really draw any conclusions from the ten-year numbers. Old manager had a superior record, then crashed and burned in 2008 and left without so much as a goodbye. New manager has adopted a more conservative strategy. He has done okay so far, but the jury is still out. Janus is not one of the best fund companies in MFM's opinion. Investors are justified in feeling used and abused when a manager, who should have a fiduciary relationship with them, loses big and then runs away.
13. Osterwies (OSTFX) 8.42%
A plain old stock picker's fund. Concentrated at just 33 stocks. Morningstar classifies it as "Mid-Cap Blend". Still a less than a billion dollars in its coffers, but just a little less. Relatively speaking, it has help up well in bear markets. For example, it was "only" down 12% in 2002 and 29% in 2008. But the long term numbers speak for themselves. Over the past 15 years, the annualized return is + 9.77%.
14. Franklin Small-Mid Cap Growth (FRSGX) 8.41%
This one can really fly in bull markets and can really get slaughtered in bear markets. If you're looking for action, you will find it here. Has been through some changes over the years, and had even changed its name. it used tro be called Franklin Small Cap Growth, but when it was flying high in the late 90's it grew rather portly and had to move up the capitalization ladder to put the money to work. One thing that has not changed is the manager. If we can just avoid those pesky downturns, this one will shine. Otherwise.....maybe not so much.
THIRD QUARTILE
15. Oakmark Equity Income (OAKBX) 8.20%
Manager has the ability to shift the concentration of stocks vs. bonds within wide parameters. recently, he has skewed towards dividend paying stocks as the best way to play defense. Remarkably smooth ride here.
16. T. Rowe Price Spectrum Growth (PRSGX) 8.1%
This fund of funds is organized in such a way that one does not pay double management fees, but rather pays the very reasonable fees that Price funds are known for. Guaranteed never to be the best or the worst growth fund. So far human input has managed to add to growth index returns. Probably will be able to do so in the future. Probably.
17. (tie) Columbia Value and Restructuring (UMBIX) 7.82%
Long time manager recently retired. What we have here at present is a portfolio of very high quality growth stocks. Lost 47% in 2008.
17. (tie) Mairs and Power Growth (MPGFX) 7.82%
45 holdings when last reported. Highest quality names with an emphasis on companies operating in the Minneapolis area. Conservative and patient with a low management fee. Should (!) hold up better than most growth funds in bear markets.
19. Litman Gregory Masters International (MSILX) 7.80%
Fund is divided among 6 subadvisors each running separate portfolios. Again, guaranteed never to be the best or the worst international fund. So far has beaten its peers fairly consistently. Great choice for international exposure.
20. (tie) Third Avenue Value (TAVFX) 7.22%
It's been a wild ride, and the past decade has not been one of the best. The Moron believes the risk is quite limited when holding for 5 years or more. A great diversifier because management analyzes companies from an entirely different perspective from most managers, emphasizing a school of analysis they refer to as "Fundamental Finance".
20. (tie) Vanguard Total Stock Market Index (VTSMX) 7.22%
The Great Dividing Line in our list. This fund represents par for the course of investing in U.S. equities. A market cap weighted index fund representing the entire U.S. market. Expense ratio is as close to zero as Vanguard can get it, recently .05% (!!!) Buy and hold this one and you will get what the market is willing to give you -- no more and only slightly less.
FOURTH QUARTILE
22. Sequoia (SEQUX) 6.60%
The Moron is surprised to find this one trailing VTSMX. For all their celebrated stock picking, over the past decade at least, the index wins. Still a great choice for an equity fund. A concentrated portfolio and managers who are among the best.
23. Franklin Balance Sheet (FRBSX) 6.44%
The Moron is surprised to see this one only slightly trailing the mighty and highly touted Sequoia Fund. Has had the same manager since its inception in 1990. Probably fair to call this an average fund that has held up at least somewhat better than average in bear markets. Long term record is certainly acceptable. Has in fact beaten VTSMX by over 2 full percentage points, annualized, when measured over a 15 year period.
24. Mutual Shares (MUTHX) 6.38%
Designed to hold up well in down drafts, it has usually succeeded in doing so. It did not do so in 2008, doing a little worse than average. Still, the downside capture ratio measured over 15 years is 70%. Not bad. May continue to lag the overall return of the market as it has over the past decade, but as a true value fund, the results should continue to be acceptable and the ride a little smoother.
25. Ariel (ARGFX) 5.69%
Disappointing. In recent years, returns have been characterized by huge swings up and down. Not in character with the "slow and steady" slogan. From peak to trough lost nearly 70% from late 2007 to early 2009. Then it took off like a riot. So what did we get for our pains? About 1.5% less annualized than the total stock market index fund.
26. Bridgeway Aggressive Growth (BRAGX) 5.68%
It's in for a dime, in for a dollar with this one. Hold on for a long, long, long time, and one just might win. Was brutally dismantled in the bear market of 2008. However its 15 year record still sparkles and shines. Certainly not for the faint of heart or the impatient. The one "Quant" fund on our list. Investing decisions here are made by computers according to proprietary formulas. In recent years, the fund has actually sported a negative management fee. (Just like our "Ideal Mutual Fund"). In other words management is actually putting extra money into the fund. This is by agreement, and in response to poor performance in recent years.
27. Jenson Quality Growth (JENSX) 6.62%
As the name says, invests in only the highest quality companies. Over time, investors should do fine here. However, the Moron sees no evidence that this fund will outperform an index of quality companies such as VDAIX. For that reason, will probably be dropped from the MFM30 soon.
28. Templeton Growth (TEPLX) 5.03%
Somebody had to be last, and it's sad that it had to be this venerable fund, of which the Moron will have much more to say later. Founded in 1954 by the legendary John Templeton, this was his firm's flagship fund. The Moron suspects that managers strayed from Sir John's principles in recent years, but now believes the fund is in better hands and back on track.
Saturday, August 25, 2012
Yacktman Speaks!
Excellent Q&A with Donald Yacktman at gurufocus.com
Yacktman Fund is at the the bottom of The MFM30 in alphabetical order, but way closer to the top in the Moron's affections.
It's certainly not even vaguely amusing as a joke anymore because it's been overused so regularly, but as Consuelo Mack has pointed out, Yacktman is one of the few who follows the two cardinal rules of investing.
1. Don't lose money.
and
2. Never forget Rule #1.
While in recent years, Yacktman has favored high quality, mostly dividend paying companies, it's not because he is married to the idea of quality at any price. He holds quality companies now because he believes that the market is offering them at compelling prices. The Moron wholeheartedly agrees with this assessment.
Further, the Moron appreciates that Mr. Yacktman also understands that dividends in and of themselves are relatively unimportant, except as to the tax consequences. It is not the dividends, but the ability to pay dividends that matters - free cash flow. The company may choose to pay dividends, buy back stock, pay down debt, or just hold cash. It's that one other use of cash that Yacktman call "the wild card" -- that is when the company reinvests in itself. That reinvestment may turn out to be spectacularly profitable, or it might turn out to be a total destruction of capital, as in the process that Peter Lynch called "di-worse-ification".
A few high points:
http://www.gurufocus.com/news/187901/donald-yacktman-interview-with-gurufocus
Yacktman Fund is at the the bottom of The MFM30 in alphabetical order, but way closer to the top in the Moron's affections.
It's certainly not even vaguely amusing as a joke anymore because it's been overused so regularly, but as Consuelo Mack has pointed out, Yacktman is one of the few who follows the two cardinal rules of investing.
1. Don't lose money.
and
2. Never forget Rule #1.
While in recent years, Yacktman has favored high quality, mostly dividend paying companies, it's not because he is married to the idea of quality at any price. He holds quality companies now because he believes that the market is offering them at compelling prices. The Moron wholeheartedly agrees with this assessment.
Further, the Moron appreciates that Mr. Yacktman also understands that dividends in and of themselves are relatively unimportant, except as to the tax consequences. It is not the dividends, but the ability to pay dividends that matters - free cash flow. The company may choose to pay dividends, buy back stock, pay down debt, or just hold cash. It's that one other use of cash that Yacktman call "the wild card" -- that is when the company reinvests in itself. That reinvestment may turn out to be spectacularly profitable, or it might turn out to be a total destruction of capital, as in the process that Peter Lynch called "di-worse-ification".
A few high points:
- Yacktman says a goal is to achieve "approximately double digit annualized returns." It's rare and refreshing to hear a manager be so specific. MFM will conservatively estimate this to mean returns of 8 -12 % annualized.
- "If you buy an above average business at below average prices, then on average, it's going to work out." Hey, then you could be ABOVE AVERAGE!
- "I can't overemphasize the importance of patience."
- "No manager performs well in all environments." MFM is going to add that one to our list of potential mutual fund advertising slogans :)
- "We believe investors would be well served not to track us versus a benchmark over shorter time periods." Yea, probably true, but we just can't help ourselves.
- "What I don't understand is why anybody in their right mind would want to own a 30-year treasury today." MFM doesn't understand it either, Mr. Yacktman.
http://www.gurufocus.com/news/187901/donald-yacktman-interview-with-gurufocus
![]() |
| Donald Yacktman |
Tuesday, August 21, 2012
The Golden Age of Mutual Funds
This has got to truly be the Golden Age of Mutual Funds. As opposed to the original Golden Age, a period of "primordial peace, harmony, stability, and prosperity" from which we have fallen, this Golden Age is one to which we have arrived. One key thing makes it a Golden Age: access to information.
Prospectuses and fund materials are available instantly. Vast reems of statistics : ditto. Financial articles and blogs. Even MUTUAL FUND MORON.
Fund managers no longer need be shadowy, anonymous figures. Interviews are on youtube, websites, and even on that 20th century device the television. Information, education, discussion, statistics......more, more, more and more. Further, the rise of indexing and numerous academic studies have given us more a scientific understanding of fund composition and performance than ever before.
Quotes for the day's activity can all be had right around 6:00 ET, two hours after the market close. In fact, one can pull up the most recent announceed portfolio of a given fund and track the market prices of the positions throughout the trading day. It's not hard or time-consuming to make a fairly accurate prediction of how a fund has done on a given day even before the market closes.
This is not even to mention closed end funds or ETFs. (The Moron, being a creature of the 20th Century pretty much does without them.)
So will the average person have better results due to all of this? Probably not.
Ignorance, fear, greed, stupidity, exploitation of the naive by financial predators -- overall, these easily cancel out the positives. For the many, and for the average person.
Further, many knowledgable people believe we may be in for a period of diminished returns from the market in general. MFM is not smart enough to know, but of course none of our Golden Age wonders could make up for a weak stock market.
Thoughts on Marty Whitman Interview - Part 2
It might be wondered why MFM has dredged up an old 5 minute interview from 4 years ago to present here. It's because MFM believes it encapsulates so many important lessons about mutual fund investing. That's true both objectively, in the information presented, but probably more importantly in being able to observe Marty's demeanor and attitude in response to sharp market declines.
As has already been observed, if anyone knows what he is doing in managing a mutual fund, Marty Whitman does. In this interview, while MFM believes he is thoughtful, humble, serious, and charming, he also displays a powerful sense of true confidence. He is unapologetic about very sharp declines over the past year. Marty's confidence is certainly not bravado or bluster, but the kind of confidence that results from competence and knowledge.
His "We just do 3 things" and "All we ever strive to do" may be prepared talking points, but they are good ones, and very revealing. His focus is on the incredible values available -- not on recent declines in market price.
As for Marty's theory that "....it's going to be pretty hard to have 2 bad years in a row"-- we can now look back and put it to test, in this instance anyway:
How did the fund do in the following calandar year?
It was up by 44.51%!
Friday, August 17, 2012
Thoughts on Marty Whitman's 2008 Inverview - Part 1
The interview in the previous post was conducted at the end of 2008. Russell was being very kind when he mentioned that "last year, you lost a fair amount of money." For the calander year 2008, Third Avenue Value Fund declined by 45.61%.
It gets worse. The fund also declined sharply in the last few months of 2007. The declines then continued until March 6, 2009. Culminating in a loss of over 12% for February 2009 alone. MFM did a little research, got the figures, took into consideration distributions, and here's what he found. From a peak per share price of $67.78 on October12, 2007 to a trough price of $25.45 on March 6, 2009, Third Avenue Value Fund declined by 61.15%.
A $10,000 investment would have declined to about $3,885 in the space of about 16 months. This is in a fund run by a man who really knows what he is doing, a man who can even be considered legendary. This is in a fund with "Value" in its name, a fund which has a slogan "cheap but safe", and fund that, in Marty's words buys in "at huge discounts to readily ascertainable net asset value."
Marty's response: "Well, ... the strategy never works consistently." Important lesson. Quite true, but MFM doesn't think it would look too good in promotional literature or as an advertising slogan. Can you imagine?
"Third Avenue Funds. Our Strategy Never Works Consistently."
But Marty is just being honest. And notice how he accepts the decline with equanimity. His focus is on the performance of the underlying companies, not on market pricing which he judges to be irrational. He feels like he will be okay since his companies have experienced almost no "permanant impairments of capital."

It gets worse. The fund also declined sharply in the last few months of 2007. The declines then continued until March 6, 2009. Culminating in a loss of over 12% for February 2009 alone. MFM did a little research, got the figures, took into consideration distributions, and here's what he found. From a peak per share price of $67.78 on October12, 2007 to a trough price of $25.45 on March 6, 2009, Third Avenue Value Fund declined by 61.15%.
A $10,000 investment would have declined to about $3,885 in the space of about 16 months. This is in a fund run by a man who really knows what he is doing, a man who can even be considered legendary. This is in a fund with "Value" in its name, a fund which has a slogan "cheap but safe", and fund that, in Marty's words buys in "at huge discounts to readily ascertainable net asset value."
Marty's response: "Well, ... the strategy never works consistently." Important lesson. Quite true, but MFM doesn't think it would look too good in promotional literature or as an advertising slogan. Can you imagine?
"Third Avenue Funds. Our Strategy Never Works Consistently."

Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)











